Karen -- Portland, Oregon USA  laptop(s) being smashed
1 2 3 4 5 »
tags: #George Harrison

(Source: materialworldblues)

(Source: kishkajensen)

Do not look for a sanctuary in anyone except your self.
—Siddhārtha Gautama (via shannyns)

(Source: larmoyante)

Read More

likeafieldmouse:

Sara Cwynar - Accidental Archives (ongoing project)

Artist’s statement: 

“The ongoing series Accidental Archives works through photography’s inherently archival nature - it involves making strange versions of familiar images, and finding examples of preexisting ‘archives’ in the world waiting to be documented.”

(Source: iraffiruse)

tags: #best character

(Source: franciscamay)

yagazieemezi:

‘Stop being overdramatic,’ they say.

‘I dont know what you mean,’ I say as I descend from the ceiling, surrounded by mist.

(Source: the-lonely-scottish-guy)

strsznszckr:

schön

(Source: bennypants)

tags: #music
Weezer - Buddy Holly
3,897 plays

currentrotation:

“Buddy Holly” by Weezer

What’s with these homies, dissin’ my girl 
Why do they gotta front 
What did we ever do to these guys
That made them so violent 

(Source: dreamselephant)

ferrisie:

allthingslinguistic:

Morphological Typology (illustrations from SpecGram)

Descriptions adapted from The Lingua File

Analytic languages: also known as isolating languages because they’re composed of isolated, or free, morphemes. Free morphemes can be words on their own, such as cat or happy. Languages that are purely analytic in structure don’t use any prefixes or suffixes, ever. However, it’s rare to find a language that is purely analytic or synthetic since most languages have characteristics of both. Morphological typology is like a spectrum in which languages fit in somewhere from analytic to polysynthetic (a subtype of synthetic languages we’ll get to in a moment).
Mandarin Chinese and Vietnamese are good examples of analytic languages. […] English, on the other hand, is one of the most analytic Indo-European languages, but is still usually classified as a synthetic language. […]
Types of synthetic language (i.e. languages that have prefixes/suffixes): 
Agglutinating Languages:With these languages, morphemes within words are usually clearly recognizable in a way that makes it easy to tell where the morpheme boundaries are. Their affixes usually only have a single meaning. Turkish,Korean, Hungarian, Japanese, and Finnish are all in this group.
Fusional Languages: Similar to agglutinating languages, except that the morpheme boundaries are much more difficult to discern. Affixes are often fused with the stems, and can have multiple meanings. A prime example of a fusional language is Spanish, especially when it comes to verbs. In the wordhablo ”I speak”, the -o morpheme tells us that we’re dealing with a subject that is singular, first person, and in the present tense. It’s difficult to find a morpheme that means “speak”, however, since habl- is not a morpheme. Fusional languages can be tricky!
Polysynthetic Languages: These languages are undoubtedly some of the most difficult to learn. They often have verbs that can express the entirety of a typical sentence in English, which they do by incorporating nouns into verbs forms. For example, the Sora language of India has one word that means “I will catch a tiger”. Many Native American languages are polysynthetic.

This FASCINATES me.

theme